Subscribe
Home
Issues
Online First
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
Value-Based Care in Myeloma
Conference Correspondent
ASCO 2015
ASCO 2015 Highlights
Comparing VHA with Fee-for-Service Cancer Care
By
Cherie Dewar
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Boston, MA—The work of 3 Harvard Medical School researchers presented at June’s AcademyHealth Conference provided a snapshot of how cancer care outcomes compare between the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and the fee-for-service Medicare community.
Read Article
Does Robotic Surgery Make the Cut?
By
Robertson Paton
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Over the past decade, polarized opinion has abounded regarding robot-assisted laparoscopy. On one side, many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of the da Vinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) in Germany and the United States described it as “revolutionary,” heralding “a new era,” and creating a “paradigm shift.”
Read Article
Understanding the Preventive Services Rule Changes
Health Policy
,
Policies & Guidelines
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
On July 14, 2010, the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services issued interim final rules for group health plans and health insurance issuers to provide detail on how those entities are to cover the preventive services required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
Read Article
Trial Participation Hampered by Costs
ASCO Conference
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Cost-related factors are a chief reason for patients declining to participate in a clinical trial, a survey of 4 community oncology practices showed.
Read Article
ASCO Weighs in on CER
ASCO Conference
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) stated that comparative effectiveness research (CER) should draw on approaches currently used for clinical trials, highlighting its stake in the matter by pointing out that CER is integral to oncology research.
Read Article
Incorporating Patient-Reported Data into the Pharma Sales Story
ISPOR Annual Meeting
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Atlanta, GA—Offering practical advice about how and when to use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to make supportable claims in the marketing of new drugs and products, a workshop directed mainly to new product developers at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research meeting in Atlanta clarified some of the basic issues surrounding the use of this type of research instrument.
Read Article
Greater Role for Pharmacogenomics Ahead
ASCO Conference
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Chicago, IL—Using genetic and pharmacogenomic information to treat patients with cancer in optimal fashion has advanced in the past several years, and the clinical utility of this approach should continue to improve as genetic research continues, said several panelists at a 2010 ASCO session on evaluating the evidence and marketing of genomic tests.
Read Article
Bevacizumab Cost-Effectiveness “in Line” with Other Therapies
ASCO Conference
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Chicago, IL—The cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab (Avastin) to first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is comparable to that of many other therapies for metastatic cancer.
Read Article
Active Surveillance Cost-Effective for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
ASCO Conference
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
Chicago, IL—Active surveillance is a cost-effective option for low-risk clinically localized prostate cancer.
Read Article
Value Propositions
Value Propositions
,
Value Peer-spectives
September 2010, Vol 1, No 4
dding trastuzumab to standard cisplatinum/fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer results in a median survival of 13.8 months, compared with 11.1 months with chemotherapy alone, according to a new study (
Lancet
. 2010;376 [9742]:687-97. Epub 2010 Aug 19).
Read Article
Page 91 of 330
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
Top Trending Articles
1.
FDA Approves Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax Combination for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
2.
FDA Launches Unified Adverse Event Monitoring System to Enhance Transparency and Efficiency
3.
Gaps in Biomarker Testing and Targeted Therapy for Gastric Cancer
Ashley Gamble, PhD
,
John Perez, MBA, MSDS
Home
Issues
Online First
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
Value-Based Care in Myeloma