Subscribe
Home
Issues
Online First
Latest Issue
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Monthly Minutes
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
VBCM
Value-Based Care in Myeloma
Articles
Articles
PD-L1 Expression Potential Biomarker for Response to Immunotherapy with MK-3475
By
Phoebe Starr
Personalized Medicine
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
San Diego, CA—Two studies, one in melanoma and one in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), presented at the 2014 American Association for Can-cer Research meeting attempted to correlate response to the anti–programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor MK-3475 with the biomarker PD-L1. The hope is that the level of PD-L1 expression will be a biomarker for the selection of patients for treatment with this new agent.
Read More
EML4-ALK Fusion Testing and Crizotinib Are Not Cost-Effective in NSCLC
In the Literature
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
Studies with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori) have shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes for the treatment of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but researchers recently questioned its cost-effectiveness.
Read More
Chemotherapy Better Option for Patients with Lung Cancer without EGFR Mutations
In the Literature
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred treatment option for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have tested positive for EGFR mutations, because of better outcomes than conventional chemotherapy.
Read More
ALK-Positive NSCLC Responds to Ceritinib Treatment
In the Literature
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSC LC) harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is sensitive to the ALK inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori). Despite initial responses to crizotinib, resistance ultimately occurs. In preclinical studies, ceritinib (Zykadia), a novel, oral adenosine triphosphate–competitive inhibitor of the ALK tyrosine kinase, has shown greater antitumor potency than crizotinib.
Read More
Multitargeted Kinase Inhibitor Shows Promise for Breast Cancer Subgroup
By
Charles Bankhead
AACR Annual Meeting
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
San Diego, CA—A multitargeted kinase inhibitor met criteria for a phase 3 clinical trial in breast cancer after statistical modeling of clinical data showed a high probability of success versus standard therapy for patients with HER2-positive/hormone receptor (HR)-negative (HER2+/HR–) disease.
Read More
Highest Response in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma with Pazopanib, Third-Line VEGF Inhibitor
By
Charles Bankhead
AACR Annual Meeting
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
San Diego, CA—Almost 50% of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) had objective responses to third-line treatment with the angiogenesis inhibitor pazopanib, according to the results of a small clinical trial reported at the 2014 American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting.
Read More
Potential New Approach to Melanoma
By
Phoebe Starr
AACR Annual Meeting
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
San Diego, CA—Preliminary results suggest that an investigational antibody-drug conjugate called DEDN-6526A (Seattle Genetics, Genentech) has activity against melanoma, including cutaneous, mucosal, and ocular melanoma, which is considered difficult to treat. The new drug comes on the heels of trastuzumab emtansine, the first antibody-drug conjugate approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of breast cancer.
Read More
Payers Facing Multiple Challenges in Ensuring Access to Cancer Care
By
Wayne Kuznar
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
Los Angeles, CA—The cost of cancer care is a major cost driver for payers, who are actively engaging in the management of this complex disease state. Payer approaches to cancer care continue to evolve, with new reimbursement methodologies key to maintaining affordability, said Gary M. Owens, MD, President, Gary Owens Associates, Ocean View, DE, and John Fox, MD, MHA, Senior Medical Director and Associate Vice President of Medical Affairs, Priority Health, Grand Rapids, MI, at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care.
Read More
Frequent Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Adds Billions to Cost
By
Rosemary Frei, MSc
Economics & Value
,
Economics of Cancer Care
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
The total annual cost of mammography screening for women aged 40 to 85 years in the United States is estimated to be $7.8 billion, according to a new analysis (O’Donoghue C, et al.
Ann Intern Med
. 2014;160:145-153). That is $4.3 billion more than the cost would be if mammography intervals were lowered to fall in line with the recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), the study researchers calculated.
Read More
Value Propositions
Economics & Value
,
Value Peer-spectives
May 2014, Vol 5, No 4
Value Propositions for May 2014.
Read More
Page 233 of 329
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
Top Trending Articles
1.
Immunotherapy Helps Navy Veteran Beat Stage 4 Lung Cancer
2.
HOPA Highlights: What's New in 2025?
3.
Peer Navigation Intervention Aims to Boost Childhood Cancer Clinical Trial Participation
Home
Issues
Online First
Latest Issue
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Monthly Minutes
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
VBCM
Value-Based Care in Myeloma