Subscribe
Home
Issues
Online First
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Monthly Minutes
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
Value-Based Care in Myeloma
Articles
Articles
Men’s Health Supplements Have No Value for Patients with Prostate Cancer
By
Phoebe Starr
Prostate Cancer
,
Solid Tumors
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
San Antonio, TX—Supplements that are often sold in supermarkets and health food stores to promote “men’s health” or “prostate health” do not provide any clinical benefits to men with prostate cancer, according to the results of a retrospective study presented at the 2015 American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting. Men’s health supplements did not significantly prevent distant metastasis, prostate cancer–related death, or treatment-related adverse events in this first-of-its-kind study.
Read More
Oncology News - November 2015
Oncology News
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
Read More
Value-Based Oncology Center of Excellence Model
By
Kelly Blair, MPA
Economics & Value
,
Value in Oncology
,
Value-Based Care
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
“Centers of Excellence” (COEs) is not a new concept in healthcare. The underlying hypothesis is that providers who specialize in a particular procedure or service will produce superior, predictable outcomes. Payers have developed COE networks to manage cost and quality for complex medical conditions for more than 2 decades, steering volume to high-performing providers in exchange for discounted contractual rates. Under significant pressure to reduce the burden of cancer spending, payers are beginning to make bold network decisions, including narrowing networks, but they need precision tools to ensure that quality of care is uncompromised, and even improved, while reining in unsustainable cost trends.
Read More
Chemotherapy Safe During Pregnancy in Second and Third Trimesters
By
Phoebe Starr
Chemotherapy
,
Pregnancy & Cancer
,
Personalized Medicine
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
Vienna, Austria—Results from a new study provide reassurance to women who have cancer while pregnant that they can safely receive treatment during the second or third trimester with chemotherapy or radiation without compromising their unborn child. The study showed that children born to mothers who receive chemotherapy or radiation during pregnancy had no impairment in general health, cognition, or cardiac function compared with children born to healthy mothers, said lead investigator Frédéric Amant, MD, PhD, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Read More
Consuming 4 Cups of Coffee Improves Outcomes in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer
By
Mary Mosley
GI Cancers
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
An apple a day keeps the doctor away. And now it seems that 4 cups of coffee a day may reduce recurrence and death in patients with stage III colon cancer after surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, according to a study led by Brendan J. Guercio, MD, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Read More
Aprepitant Improves Emesis Control in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
,
GI Cancers
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
Barcelona, Spain—Controlling and minimizing nausea and vomiting enables patients with cancer to continue their chemotherapy. A clinical trial reported at the 2015 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer shows that the newly approved agent aprepitant (Emend), an oral neurokinin (NK)
1
antagonist, improved antiemetic control in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who were receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, according to Junichi Nishimura, MD, Assistant Professor, Osaka University, Japan.
Read More
Systemic Therapy plus Radiofrequency: Ablation Survival Benefit in Colorectal Liver Metastases
By
Walter Alexander
GI Cancers
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
Barcelona, Spain—The first randomized study prospectively investigating the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) added to standard systemic treatment in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases revealed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits, according to Theo J.M. Ruers, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam.
Read More
Ramucirumab Confers Survival Benefit in Some Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
By
Walter Alexander
GI Cancers
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
Barcelona, Spain—In the REACH trial evaluating ramucirumab (Cyramza) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after first-line therapy with sorafenib (Nexavar), overall survival (OS) was improved in the subgroup population with baseline α-fetoprotein of ?400 ng/mL (Child-Pugh class A). The OS benefits in the overall population (Child-Pugh classes A and B) did not reach significance, said lead investigator Andrew X. Zhu, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston.
Read More
Screening in Younger First-Degree Relatives of Patients with CRC
By
Rosemary Frei, MSc
Cancer Screening
,
Personalized Medicine
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention documented an average 38% colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rate among people aged 40 to 49 years, and a 69.7% rate in those aged ?50 years with a first-degree relative with CRC. An earlier analysis of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2005 and 2010 showed that first-degree relatives of patients with CRC were 70% more likely to have a colonoscopy than their counterparts.
Read More
MRI Screening of Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer Improves Detection
By
Corbin Davis
Breast Cancer
,
Cancer Screening
,
Personalized Medicine
November 2015, Vol 6, No 10
San Francisco, CA—Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening of women who are at average risk for breast cancer had a mean additional cancer diagnosis yield of 15.8 per 1000 patients, surpassing the yields for digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound in a new study. The results were presented at the 2015 Breast Cancer Symposium, by Christiane K. Kuhl, MD, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany. This suggests that breast MRI screening alone every 3 years may be sufficient for women at average risk.
Read More
Page 182 of 329
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Top Trending Articles
1.
ACCC Federal Policy Update Highlights Key Risks and Opportunities for Oncology Practices in 2026
Meg Barbor, MPH
2.
From Chaos to Clarity: Data-Driven Denial Prevention
Shawntea (Taya) Gordon, MBA, FACMPE
3.
The Evolving Landscape of Lung Cancer Care
Meg Barbor, MPH
Home
Issues
Online First
Issue Archive
Special Issues
Browse By Topic
Personalized Medicine
Economics & Value
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
COVID-19
Cholangiocarcinoma
View All Topics ›
Conference Correspondent
ESMO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2025 - Wrap-Up: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Monthly Minutes
Webinars
Quick Quiz
Press Releases
Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
Value-Based Care in Myeloma