Articles

Efforts to Maximize Value-Based Cancer Care in a Fragmented Care Delivery System
Despite the fragmented nature of the U.S. care delivery and payment system, disparate healthcare stakeholders continue to seek areas of alignment in reducing inefficiencies and enhancing value-driven oncology care.
Read More

Quantifying the Impact and Value of Oncology Navigation on Patient Outcomes
The development and implementation of validated, evidence-based oncology navigation measures are an integral component of broader efforts to promote patient-centric, value-based cancer care.
Read More

Value-Based Payment Reform: Focus on the Oncology Care Model
The Oncology Care Model was designed to provide higher quality, more highly coordinated oncology care at the same or lower cost to Medicare. As the program matures, new data is expected to provide insight on the achievement of that ambitious goal.
Read More

Development and optimization of patient support programs requires organizational alignment and a comprehensive understanding of the payment and care delivery ecosystem in cancer.
Read More

As the number of people living with cancer continues to increase, so does the need for advocacy, education, and safety net programs to help patients afford the cost of care.
Read More

On November 2, 2018, the FDA approved pegfilgrastim-cbqv (Udenyca; Coherus BioSciences), as the second biosimilar to pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), to reduce the risk for infection in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy, which may result in febrile neutropenia.
Read More

On October 16, 2018, the FDA approved talazoparib (Talzenna; Pfizer), a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with HER2-­negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation, as identified by an FDA-approved test.
Read More

Chicago, IL—So far, 2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have been approved by the FDA for some types of relapsed or refractory lymphoma and leukemia. Although CAR T-cell therapy has shown promise in many ­patients who have run out of standard treatment options, it is incredibly ­resource-intense: the complexities of its administration ­require an interdisciplinary approach for success, the side effects can be severe, and its high cost can reach upward of $1 million per course of treatment.
Read More

Although the cost of care can have severe effects on patients with cancer and their families, oncologists rarely address financial toxicity, according to Hanna K. Sanoff, MD, MPH, Medical Director, University of North Carolina (UNC) NC Cancer Hospital Clinics.
Read More


Page 107 of 329